Diagnostic performance of minimum and mean apparent diffusion coefficient parameters in evaluation of resectable rectal cancer
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the diagnostic correlations between MinADC and MeanADC values of resectable rectal cancer with tumoral histopathological features.
Methods: This cross-sectional study included 52 rectal cancer patients that were subjected to preoperative MRI and DWI. MeanADC and MinADC values were calculated and correlated with clinicopathological characteristics.
Results: MeanADC and MinADC values correlated statistically significant with tumor histological grade(MeanADC: t= 2.494, p = 0.016; MinADC: t = 2.857, p = 0.006). MeanADC correlated significantly with T-classification (MeanADC: t = 2.678, p = 0.010)and with perineural invasion(MeanADC: t = 2.525, p = 0.015). MeanADC and MinADC statistically correlated significantly with extramural vascular invasion(MeanADC: t = 2.023, p = 0.048; MinADC: t = 2.055, p = 0.045) and CRM invasion MinADC showed statistically significant correlation(MinADC: t=2.657, p=0.011). MinADC values showed higher diagnostic efficacy in discriminating well vs poor and moderately differentiated rectal cancer than MeanADC values, with threshold value of 0.55x10-3mm2/s(sensitivity, 58%; specificity, 90%)but MeanADC values showed higher diagnostic efficacy in discriminating extramural vascular invasion than MinADC values with threshold value of 1.21x10-3mm2/s(sensitivity, 77.8%; specificity, 76.7%).
Conclusion: Pretreatment combination of mean and minimum ADC values used as a non-invasive parameter to evaluate the aggressiveness of rectal cancer.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
- Cai C, Hu T, Gong J, et al. Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics signature for preoperative estimation of tumor-stroma ratio in rectal cancer. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(5):3326-3335. doi:10.1007/s00330-020-07403-6
- Liu J, Li Q, Tang L, Huang Z, Lin Q. Correlations of Mean and Mimimum Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values With the Clinicopathological Features in Rectal Cancer. Acad Radiol. 2021;28 Suppl 1:S105-S111. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2020.10.018
- Attenberger UI, Tavakoli A, Stocker D, et al. Reduced and standard field-of-view diffusion weighted imaging in patients with rectal cancer at 3 T-Comparison of image quality and apparent diffusion coefficient measurements. Eur J Radiol. 2020;131:109257. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109257
- Li H, Chen GW, Liu YS, et al. Assessment of histologic prognostic factors of resectable rectal cancer: comparison of diagnostic performance using various apparent diffusion coefficient parameters. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):11554. Published 2020 Jul 14. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-68328-0
- Chen Y, Wen Z, Liu Y, et al. Value of High-resolution MRI in Detecting Lymph Node Calcifications in Patients with Rectal Cancer. Acad Radiol. 2020;27(12):1709-1717. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2020.01.003
- Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, et al. Rectal Cancer, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN. 2022 Oct;20(10):1139-1167. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0051. PMID: 36240850.
- Surov A, Pech M, Powerski M, Woidacki K, Wienke A. Pretreatment Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Cannot Predict Histopathological Features and Response to Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy in Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Dig Dis. 2022;40(1):33-49. doi:10.1159/000515631
- Sun Y, Tong T, Cai S, Bi R, Xin C, Gu Y. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) value: a potential imaging biomarker that reflects the biological features of rectal cancer. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e109371. Published 2014 Oct 10. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109371
- Dreher C, Kuder TA, König F, et al. Modulating Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Screening in Oncologic Tertiary Prevention: A Prospective Ex Vivo and In Vivo Study. Invest Radiol. 2019;54(11):704-711. doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000596-
- Mebis W, et al. Correlation Between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value on MRI and Histopathologic WHO Grades of Neuroendocrine Tumors. Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology. 2020; 104(1): 7, 1–9. doi: 10.5334/jbsr.1925
- Li X, Zhang K, Shi Y, Wang F, Meng X. Correlations between the minimum and mean apparent diffusion coefficient values of hepatocellular carcinoma and tumor grade. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;44(6):1442-1447. doi:10.1002/jmri.25323
- Murakami R, Hirai T, Sugahara T, et al. Grading astrocytic tumors by using apparent diffusion coefficient parameters: superiority of a one- versus two-parameter pilot method. Radiology. 2009;251(3):838-845. doi:10.1148/radiol.2513080899
- Chen Y, Wen Z, Liu Y, et al. Value of High-resolution MRI in Detecting Lymph Node Calcifications in Patients with Rectal Cancer. Acad Radiol. 2020;27(12):1709-1717. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2020.01.003
- Ma L, Lian S, Liu H, et al. Diagnostic performance of synthetic magnetic resonance imaging in the prognostic evaluation of rectal cancer. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022;12(7):3580-3591. doi:10.21037/qims-22-24
- Kargol J, Rudnicki W, Kenig J, et al. Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of 103 Patients with Rectal Adenocarcinoma Identifies the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as an Imaging Marker for Tumor Invasion and Regional Lymph Node Involvement. Med Sci Monit. 2021;27:e934941. Published 2021 Dec 6. doi:10.12659/MSM.934941
- Curvo-Semedo L, Lambregts DM, Maas M, Beets GL, Caseiro-Alves F, Beets-Tan RG. Diffusion-weighted MRI in rectal cancer: apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential noninvasive marker of tumor aggressiveness. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;35(6):1365-1371. doi:10.1002/jmri.23589
- Tang C, Lin MB, Xu JL, et al. Are ADC values of readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging (RESOLVE) correlated with pathological prognostic factors in rectal adenocarcinoma?. World J Surg Oncol. 2018;16(1):138. Published 2018 Jul 12. doi:10.1186/s12957-018-1445-z
- Akashi M, Nakahusa Y, Yakabe T, et al. Assessment of aggressiveness of rectal cancer using 3-T MRI: correlation between the apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential imaging biomarker and histologic prognostic factors. Acta Radiologica. 2014;55(5):524-531. doi:10.1177/0284185113503154
- Yuan Y, Chen XL, Li ZL, et al. The application of apparent diffusion coefficients derived from intratumoral and peritumoral zones for assessing pathologic prognostic factors in rectal cancer. Eur Radiol. 2022;32(8):5106-5118. doi:10.1007/s00330-022-08717-3
- Lambregts DM, Beets GL, Maas M, et al. Tumour ADC measurements in rectal cancer: effect of ROI methods on ADC values and interobserver variability. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(12):2567-2574. doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2220-5
- Bakan AA, Inci E, Bakan S, Gokturk S, Cimilli T. Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of liver fibrosis. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(3):682-687. doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2295-z
- Aoyagi T, Shuto K, Okazumi S, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient correlation with oesophageal tumour stroma and angiogenesis. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(6):1172-1177. doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2359-0
- Ao W, Bao X, Mao G, Yang G, Wang J, Hu J. Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Assessing Preoperative T Staging of Low Rectal Cancer and Whether This Is Correlated With Ki-67 Expression. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2020;71(1):5-11. doi:10.1177/0846537119885666
- Ao W, Zhang X, Yao X, Zhu X, Deng S, Feng J. Preoperative prediction of extramural venous invasion in rectal cancer by dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion weighted MRI: a preliminary study. BMC Med Imaging. 2022;22(1):78. Published 2022 Apr 28. doi:10.1186/s12880-022-00810-9
- Tong T, Yao Z, Xu L, et al. Extramural depth of tumor invasion at thin-section MR in rectal cancer: associating with prognostic factors and ADC value. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;40(3):738-744. doi:10.1002/jmri.24398.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36162/hjr.v9i2.609
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.