Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and local staging with MDCT: Effect of tube voltage and iodine load on assessment of vascular involvement

Louiza Loizou, Bertil Leidner, Elisabet Axelsson, Marco Del Chiaro, Christoph Ansorge, Caroline Verbeke, Anders Sundin, Nikolaos Kartalis


Purpose: In patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) a low-tube-voltage, high-iodine-load multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) protocol has been shown to increase tumour conspicuity compared to normal-tube-voltage, normal-iodine-load (standard) protocol. The aim of this study was to prospectively compare a low-tube-voltage with high- or normal-iodine-load MDCT protocol with a standard protocol regarding vascular involvement in patients with PDAC.

Material and Methods: Thirty consecutive patients (16 women-14 men; mean age 67 and 65 years, respectively) with PDAC, deemed primary resectable at the multidisciplinary board, underwent twice preoperative triple-phase MDCT according to: (i) 120-kV standard protocol (PS; 0.75g iodine (I)/kg body weight, n=30) and (ii) 80-kV protocol A (PA; 0.75g I/kg, n=14) or protocol B (PB; 1g I/kg, n=16). Two independent readers evaluated vascular involvement and accuracy per protocol was calculated. A third reader calculated the vessel-to-tumour contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Statistical analysis was performed with the Chi-square test. Standard of reference was surgical and histopathological findings.

Results: For readers 1/2, the accuracy of PS, PA, and PB was 91/91, 92/94, and 92/90%, respectively (P>0.05). Compared to PS, PA and PB showed significantly higher artery-to-tumour CNR in the parenchymal phase (P=0.015 and 0.0016, respectively) and vein-to-tumour CNR in the portal-venous phase (both, P<0.001). PB had significantly higherartery-to-tumour CNR compared to PA in parenchymal phase (P=0.049).

Conclusions: In primary resectable PDAC, vascular involvement was assessed with similarly high accuracy with all protocols. Low-tube-voltage protocols, particularly with high-iodine-load, increase the vessels-to-tumour CNR compared to standard protocol and may prove beneficial in patients with locally advanced tumours where assessment of vascular invasion may be challenging.


pancreatic neoplasm/ductal; tumour staging; multidetector CT/protocols; contrast media

Full Text:



Kamisawa T, Wood LD, Itoi T, et al. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet 2016; 388 (10039): 73-85.

Gillen S, Schuster T, Meyer Zum Buschenfelde C, et al. Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. PLoS Med 2010; 7(4): e1000267.

Conroy T, Bachet JB, Ayav A, et al. Current standards and new innovative approaches for treatment of pancreatic cancer. Eur J Cancer 2016; 57: 10-22.

Heinemann V, Haas M, Boeck S. Neoadjuvant treatment of borderline resectable and non-resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol 2013; 24(10): 2484-2492.

Cameron JL, He J. Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 220(4): 530-536.

Datta J, Vollmer CM Jr. Advances in surgical management of pancreatic diseases. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2016; 45(1): 129-144.

Varadhachary GR, Tamm EP, Abbruzzese JL, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: definitions, management, and role of preoperative therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13(8): 1035-1046.

Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Behrman SW, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 2.2014: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2014; 12(8): 1083-1093.

Lu DS, Reber HA, Krasny RM, et al. Local staging of pancreatic cancer: criteria for unresectability of major vessels as revealed by pancreatic-phase, thin-section helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168(6): 1439-1443.

Brennan DD, Zamboni GA, Raptopoulos VD, et al. Comprehensive preoperative assessment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with 64-section volumetric CT. Radiographics 2007; 27(6): 1653-1666.

Raman SP, Fishman EK. Advances in CT Imaging of GI Malignancies. Gastrointest Cancer Res 2012; 5 (3 Suppl 1): S4-9.

Bockhorn M, Uzunoglu FG, Adham M. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 2014; 155(6): 977-988.

Heiken JP, Brink JA, McClennan BL, et al. Dynamic incremental CT: effect of volume and concentration of contrast material and patient weight on hepatic enhancement. Radiology 1995; 195(2): 353-357.

Yamashita Y, Komohara Y, Takahashi M, et al. Abdominal helical CT: evaluation of optimal doses of intravenous contrast material-a prospective randomized study. Radiology 2000; 216(3): 718-723.

McNulty NJ, Francis IR, Platt JF, et al. Multi-detector row helical CT of the pancreas: effect of contrast-enhanced multiphasic imaging on enhancement of the pancreas, peripancreatic vasculature, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Radiology 2001; 220(1): 97-102.

Kidoh M, Nakaura T, Nakamura S. Low-dose abdominal CT: comparison of low tube voltage with moderate-level iterative reconstruction and standard tube voltage, low tube current with high-level iterative reconstruction. Clin Radiol 2013; 68(10): 1008-1015.

Schindera ST, Nelson RC, Mukundan S Jr. Hypervascular liver tumors: low tube voltage, high tube current multi-detector row CT for enhanced detection-phantom study. Radiology 2008; 246(1): 125-132.

Loizou L, Albiin N, Ansorge C, et al. Computed tomography staging of pancreatic cancer: a validation study addressing interobserver agreement. Pancreatology 2013; 13(6): 570-575.

Loizou L, Albiin N, Leidner B, et al. Multidetector CT of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Effect of tube voltage and iodine load on tumour conspicuity and image quality. Eur Radiol 2016; 26(11): 4021-4029.

Campbell F, Verbeke CS. Pancreatic pathology - a practical approach. Springer London 2013.

Daniel WW. Biostatistics: A foundation for analysis in the health sciences, 6th edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York 1995.

Nattenmüller J, Hosch W, Nguyen TT, et al. Hypodense liver lesions in patients with hepatic steatosis: do we profit from dual-energy computed tomography? Eur Radiol 2015; 25(12): 3567-3576.

Robinson E, Babb J, Chandarana H, et al. Dual source dual energy MDCT: comparison of 80 kVp and weighted average 120 kVp data for conspicuity of hypo-vascular liver metastases. Invest Radiol 2010; 45(7): 413-418.

Loyer EM, David CL, Dubrow RA, et al. Vascular involvement in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: reassessment by thin-section CT. Abdom Imaging 1996; 21(3): 202-206.

McIntyre CA, Winter JM. Diagnostic evaluation and staging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Semin Oncol 2015; 42(1): 19-27.

Fong ZV, Tan WP, Lavu H. Preoperative imaging for resectable periampullary cancer: clinicopathologic implications of reported radiographic findings. J Gastrointest Surg 2013; 17(6): 1098-1106.

Verbeke CS. Resection margins and R1 rates in pancreatic cancer-are we there yet? Histopathology 2008; 52(7): 787-796.

Esposito I, Kleeff J, Bergmann F. Most pancreatic cancer resections are R1 resections. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15(6): 1651-1660.



  • There are currently no refbacks.