Experience with the use of a dose management system in the everyday routine of a CT department. A touchstone or a millstone?

Virginia Tsapaki, Niki Fitousi, Alexandros Salametis, Dimitrios Niotis, Ioannis Papailiou


Purpose: A dose tracking software was recently installed in our CT department. The study aimed at evaluating the software capabilities and staff performance in every day routine. 

Material and Methods: A dose tracking software was connected to a 64-slice CT scanner. All technical and dosimetric data of 6,010 CT examinations were analysed. Organ doses estimated by the software were also evaluated.  

Results: The software provided easy and quick statistical overview of clinical and technical data. Typical local doses were comparable to national and international data. Organ doses proved to be an instrumental and supportive tool in individualised patient dosimetry.

Conclusions: The software offered easy and quick statistical overview of all CT clinical and technical data and a valuable overview of workload statistics, which occasionally required discussion with the staff and, in some cases, corrective actions. It easily provided the time periods the scanner was not in use, and facilitated easy scheduling of routine quality control tests and other routine tasks in the department. A number of errors were identified and communicated to the staff; corrective actions were taken.


CT;dose;tracking software;optimization;management

Full Text:



Mori S, Endo M, Nishizawa K, et al. Comparison of patient doses in 256-slice CT and 16-slice CT scanners. Br J Radiol 2006; 79: 56–61.

Silverman JD, Paul NS, Siewerdsen JH. Investigation of lung nodule detectability in low-dose 320-slice computed tomography. Med Phys 2009; 36(5): 1700-1710.

Kalra MK, Woisetschläger M, Dahlström N, et al. Sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction of low-dose chest CT: Effect on image quality and radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; W235-W244.

Gaztanaga J, Garcia MJ. New noninvasive imaging technologies in coronary artery disease. Curr Cardiol Rep 2009; 11(4): 252-257.

Pauls S, Gabelmann A, Heinz W, et al. Liver perfusion with dynamic multidetector-row computed tomography as an objective method to evaluate the efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer. Clin Imaging 2009; 33(4): 289-294.

Türkvatan A, Olçer T, Cumhur T. Multidetector CT urography of renal fusion anomalies. Diagn Interv Radiol 2009; 15(2): 127-134.

Flor N, Zuin M, Brovelli F, et al. Regenerative nodules in patients with chronic Budd-Chiari syndrome: A longitudinal study using multiphase contrast-enhanced multidetector CT. Eur J Radiol 2010; 73(3): 588-593.

International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). Annals of the ICRP 102, 2007. V 37/1, Elsevier.

Shrimpton PC. Protection of the patient in X-ray computed tomography. Documents of the National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) 1992; V 3, N 4 Chilton: NRPB.

Baert AL, Knauth M, Sartor K. Radiation dose from adult and pediatric multidetector computed tomography. Springer, 2007.

Tsalafoutas IA, Tsapaki V, Triantopoulou C, et al. CT guided interventional procedures: Patient effective and skin dose considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 1479–1484.

Mayo-Smith WW, Hara A, Mahesh M, et al. How I do it: Managing radiation dose in CT. Radiology 2014; 273(3): 657-672.

Jones AC, Woldemikael D, Fisher T, et al. Repeated computed tomographic scans in transferred trauma patients: Indications, costs, and radiation exposure. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012; 73(6): 1564-1569.

United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) 2008. Report to the General Assembly, V I: (Sources) Report to the General Assembly, Scientific Annex A, United Nations, New York, 2010.

Griffey RT, Sodickson A. Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimates in emergency department patients undergoing repeat or multiple CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192(4): 887-892.

Tsapaki V, Rehani M. Dose management in CT facility. Biomed Imaging Interv J 2007; 3(2):e43.

Report of American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 23. CT Dosimetry: The measurement, reporting, and management of radiation dose in CT. AAPM Report 96, One Physics Ellipse, College Park, 2008.

Shrimpton PC, Jansen JT, Harrison JD. Updated estimates of typical effective doses for common CT examinations in the UK following the 2011 national review. Br J Radiol 2016; 89: 20150346.

Mettler FA, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, et al. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: A catalog. Radiology 2008; 248: 254–263.

McCollough CH, Bushberg JT, Fletcher JG, et al. Answers to common questions about the use and safety of CT scans. Mayo Clin Proc 2015; 90(10): 1380-1392.

National council on radiation protection and measurements (NCRP). NCRP Report No. 160 - Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States, Bethesda, MD, USA, 2009.

Christner JA, Kofler JM, McCollough CH. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with usingorgan doses: Consequences of adopting international commission on radiological protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194: 881-889.

Yeh DM, Tsai HY, Tyan YS, et al. The Population effective dose of medical computed tomography examinations in Taiwan for 2013. Jagetia GC 2016, ed. PLoS ONE. 11(10): e0165526. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0165526.

Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, et al. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 13761-13766.

Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2277-2284.

Brenner DJ. Should we be concerned about the rapid increase in CT usage? Rev Environ Health 2010; 25(1): 63-68.

The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007; 37(2-4): 1-332.

European Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom on basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation and repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom. OJ of the EU. L13; 57: 1-73 (2014).

Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources. International basic safety standards general safety requirements international atomic energy agency (IAEA) safety standards series No. GSR Part 3, Vienna, 2014.

Seuri R, Rehani MM, Kortesniemi M. How tracking radiologic procedures and dose helps: Experience from Finland. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200: 771-775.

Duong PA, Little BP. Dose tracking and dose auditing in a comprehensive computed tomography dose-reduction program. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 2004; 35: 322-330.

Nicol RM, Wayte SC, Bridges AJ, et al. Experiences of using a commercial dose management system (GE DoseWatch) for CT examinations. Br J Radiol 2015; 5: 20150617.

Hadid L, Waryn MJ, Brillet PY, et al. Impact of a dose-tracking software and iterative reconstruction technique on the optimisation of CT protocols. Application to the radiology department of the hospital group “Avicenne, Jean-Verdier, René Muret”. Physica Medica 2013; 29: e15.

De Bondt T, Mulkens T, Zanca F, et al. Benchmarking pediatric cranial CT protocols using a dose tracking software system: A multicenter study. Eur Radiol 2017; 27 (2): 841-850.

Wang J, Molvin L, Marsh D, et al. A management tool for CT dose monitoring, analysis, and protocol review. Med Phys 2014; 41: 558.

MacGregor K, Li I, Dowdell T, et al. Identifying institutional diagnostic reference levels for CT with radiation dose Index Monitoring Software. Radiology 2015; 276 (2): 507-517.

Chatzoglou V, Kottou S, Nikolopoulos D, et al. Management and optimisation of the dose in computed tomography via dose tracking software. OMICS J Radiol 2016; 5: 227. doi:10.4172/2167-7964.1000227.

https://qaelum.com/solutions/dose. Last assessed 27 November 2017.

European semester thematic fiche. Health and health systems. http//www. Ec.europa.eu/europe2020/pdf/themes/2016/health_systems_201605.pdf (last assessesed 14 March 2017).

European Commission. Radiation protection 109. Guidance on diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for medical exposures. Directorate-General, Environment, Nuclear Sa

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36162/hjr.v3i1.173


  • There are currently no refbacks.